Launching a new crypto token is exciting—but getting it listed on the right platforms is where the real challenge begins. Many projects struggle with the same question:
Should we submit our token manually to directories, voting sites, and listing platforms, or use a professional submission service like TokenBeam?
To help you decide, let’s compare TokenBeam vs. manual submissions in terms of time, cost, and results.
1. Time: Efficiency Matters
Manual Submissions
- You’ll need to search and shortlist every directory and listing site yourself.
- Filling out forms repeatedly takes hours—or even days—per platform.
- Some sites require follow-ups or verification emails, which add delays.
Result: Manual submissions can easily take 20–40+ hours depending on the number of platforms.
TokenBeam Submissions
- TokenBeam already has a curated list of top directories, voting platforms, and listing sites.
- Our team handles the entire process for you—submission, tracking, and confirmation.
- You save time and focus on your project while we do the heavy lifting.
Result: Submissions completed in a fraction of the time, with guaranteed coverage.
Winner: TokenBeam – Faster and more efficient.
2. Cost: Hidden vs. Transparent
Manual Submissions
- At first, it may seem “free.” But consider:
- Countless hours of your own (or your team’s) time.
- Paid listings on premium platforms.
- Extra cost for mistakes or resubmissions.
- The hidden “time cost” often exceeds your budget.
TokenBeam Submissions
- We provide transparent packages that cover both free and paid platforms.
- No need to worry about missing requirements or wasting fees.
- Affordable pricing designed to give you maximum exposure within budget.
Winner: TokenBeam – Clear, cost-effective, and no hidden expenses.
3. Results: Reach & Reliability
Manual Submissions
- Risk of rejection if forms aren’t filled correctly.
- Some platforms might be skipped due to lack of awareness.
- Hard to track where your token is listed and whether it’s live.
TokenBeam Submissions
- Submissions are done by crypto professionals who know each platform’s requirements.
- Access to top-tier sites ensures your project gets maximum visibility.
- Detailed reporting so you know exactly where your token is live.
- Boosts credibility, community trust, and project reach.
Winner: TokenBeam – Higher success rate with guaranteed visibility.
| Factor | Manual Submissions | TokenBeam Submissions |
| Time Required | 20–40+ hours | Few hours (handled by experts) |
| Cost | Hidden & variable | Transparent, budget-friendly |
| Success Rate | Medium | High (professional handling) |
| Tracking | Difficult | Detailed reports |
| Best For | DIY projects with lots of free time | Serious projects aiming for exposure & growth |
Conclusion: Why TokenBeam Wins
While manual submissions may seem cheaper at first glance, they are time-consuming, error-prone, and limited in reach. TokenBeam, on the other hand, offers a faster, more reliable, and cost-effective solution that ensures your token gets the visibility it deserves.
If you want to save time, cut hidden costs, and maximize results, TokenBeam is the smarter way to submit your token.